Ethical relativism vs absolutism : research implications

Purpose &ndash; The constructs of relativism and absolutism have a significant role to play in the development of ethical theory; however, they are commonly simplified in their depictions and are philosophically more complex than we give them credit for. The purpose of this paper is to undertake an in-depth examination of ethical relativity and ethical absolutism before concluding with a discussion of which research implications warrant further investigation.Design/methodology/approach &ndash; A descriptive, historical, anthological approach has been taken.Findings &ndash; Ethical relativism is regrettably subject to a proliferation of related terminology and, in many instances with different meanings ascribed to similar terms. In addition, ethical relativity appears to attract different research perspectives that are heavily dependent on their academic origins. A clear distinction needs to be made between ethical and situational relativity. It is suggested that relativism is present in the process of moral justification and that ethical relativism should be analyzed from three levels: the individual level, the role and group level, and the cultural levels. The over-riding objection to ethical relativism rests on the consequences of accepting relativism, which undermines the existence and strength of global moral standards and the inherent positioning of ethical absolutism. Absolutism does not deny the existence of multiple moral practices evident around the world, but proposes that variations in ethical actions could still be rooted in common universal moral standards based on our requirements as human beings and the necessities of long-term survival.Research limitations/implications &ndash; The ensuing discussions of relativism and absolutism open up a rich vein of research opportunities and suggest caution is required in regard to research methodologies. From a methodological perspective, care needs to be taken. For example, using hypothetical ethical dilemmas that are often unrelated to a specific industry or cultural setting has resulted in many researchers observing situational relativity rather than true ethical relativity.Originality/value &ndash; This paper specifically examines whether there are differences in underlying and basic moral standards even though similarities in ethical behaviour have been determined, or whether differing ethical actions could, as the absolutists believe, originate from common universal standards despite apparent differences in perceptions and actions across cultures.<br /

An anthology of codes of ethics

Purpose &ndash; Corporate codes of conduct originated around 1900 in the USA gaining further momentum in the 1950s in relation to anti-trust legislation. Subsequently, the adoption of codes of ethics has spread throughout the world and they now feature extensively in many organisations. The literature relating to codes of ethics, therefore, spans many decades and is undoubtedly comprehensive. The purpose of the paper is to provide an appropriate anthology of codes of ethics. Design/methodology/approach &ndash; A descriptive, historical, anthological approach has been taken.Findings &ndash; This paper examines the motivations for the adoption of codes of ethics, which naturally also includes international codes, their frequency of use and content. Codes are also not without critique and it is appropriate to highlight the criticisms of codes, to provide an assessment of their potential effectiveness, the issues surrounding implementation and enforcement and the relationship to organisational culture and leadership.Research limitations/implications &ndash; As noted, the literature on codes of conduct is extensive and while effort has been made to capture the key themes the review is not necessarily exhaustive.Originality/value &ndash; The literature is characterised by the means of institutionalising ethics in organisations and the paper concludes with a summative reflection on the key dimensions that appear to be paramount for improving the efficacy of codes of conduct.<br /

Codes of ethics

This chapter initially examines the motivations for the adoption of codes, the frequency of use and the likely content, including those for use in the international context. This is then followed by a discussion of the criticisms of codes as well as the indicators of their effectiveness. The chapter concludes with an examination of the more pragmatic dimensions associated with the implementation, the enforcement, the influence of corporate culture and leadership

Training to fail

The corporate environment is considered the major deterrent to the success of corporate training and development programs. Most organizations will not take training and development seriously without support from CEOs. Many companies lack investment in training, while others refuse to accept process management, TQM and empowerment as the keys to reduced costs and improved productivity. Training and development must also be linked corporate strategy.<br /